Finally, circling back to I, FRANKENSTEIN for a solid article about the film itself, Charlie Jane Anders explores “The Deeper Meaning of the Frankenstein-vs-Monsters Film” on I09.
January 26, 2014
I, Frankenstein Write-Ups
As the only new film in wide release this week — and reviews
slow coming in because no press screenings were held — I, FRANKENSTEIN is still
getting a lot of ink. Seems like everybody had the same idea: Use this
opportunity to run a feature on Frankenstein movies, peppered with jokes, if
possible. Here’s a roundup…
A group of film critics at Craveonline weigh in with their favorite Frankenstein films,
yielding an interesting list that includes BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN, SPIRIT OF THE
BEEHIVE, ROBOCOP and SPLICE. Barry Paris of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette considers the eternal appeal of Frankenstein’s
Monster with a list of 20 Frankenstein movies that favors jokey titles such as
JESSE JAMES MEETS FRANKENSTEIN’S DAUGHTER and DR. FRANKENSTEIN’S WAX MUSEUM OF
THE HUNGRY DEAD. Over at IGN, Scott
Collura goes all out with humor and offers The Weirdest Frankenstein
Movies Ever.
Brett Weiss in The Charlotte Observer knows his stuff and provides an informed overview of
Frankenstein over two centuries, touching on films, TV, print, song and The
Monster as pop culture icon.
Gary Wolcott of The Tri-City Herald covers a handful of Frankenstein films, expressing his preference for
spoofs, ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN and YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN being
perfectly wise choices, but he stumbles badly, ditching Boris Karloff as “a
low-rent, not-too-talented actor”(!) and
admits nodding off, “bored”, to
the 1931 FRANKENSTEIN. Mr. Wolcott is also one of several writers this week who
mention the Branagh/De Niro MARY SHELLEY’S FRANKENSTEIN of 1994 as lacking,
though “the most faithful to Shelley’s book”. The film is indeed problematic but, don’t be
fooled by the title, it isn’t very faithful to the novel at all.
The lightest, perhaps most lightheaded offerings play off
the hunk factor of the new Monster. After all, Aaron Eckhart is the first
Frankenstein Monster to make the cover of Muscle and Fitness magazine. VH1 has a photo gallery of the Most Boneable Frankenstein
Monsters, number one being Susan Denberg of
FRANKENSTEIN CREATED WOMAN, in which, sigh, “Frankenstein is played
by Grand Moff Tarkin”. In a similar vein, Buzzfeed ranks an assortment of Frankenstein Monsters by “hotness”, with Srdjan Zelenovic of FLESH FOR FRANKENSTEIN a
clear winner. Though he’s on the list, let’s admit that Jack Bloom’s Monster
from DRACULA VS FRANKENSTEIN never had a chance.
Getting serious, Adrian Ma on the CBC website takes an historical survey of Frankenstein
appearances through the ages. It barely scratches the surface — a whole book
would be needed for that —but it makes good choices. It’s also the only article
to name check T.P.Cooke.
The best of the bunch here is Brian Truitt essay in USA Today, despite his placing Franc Roddam’s
THE BRIDE among the bad Frankenstein films. The article wins in terms of presentation,
with a commissioned collection of 9 dynamic digital portraits by artist Jerry
Mosemak.
Finally, circling back to I, FRANKENSTEIN for a solid article about the film itself, Charlie Jane Anders explores “The Deeper Meaning of the Frankenstein-vs-Monsters Film” on I09.
Finally, circling back to I, FRANKENSTEIN for a solid article about the film itself, Charlie Jane Anders explores “The Deeper Meaning of the Frankenstein-vs-Monsters Film” on I09.
Now, we’ll see if all the Frankenstein copy can translate
into box office action for the movie. Barely out of the gate, first word — from
Variety — has this Frankenstein “Dead
on Arrival”. Better hurry up this coming
week if you want to see it in a theater.
Labels: • I Frankenstein
January 12, 2014
The Shelley-Godwin Archive
Now THIS is what the web was created for! I’m not kidding.
Recently, on Halloween last, the existing manuscript of Frankenstein was made freely available online. That’s all of Mary
Shelley’s original notebooks, the drafts and copies in her own hand. Every page up for scrutiny, accompanied by
corresponding transcription, and you can toggle to highlight Mary’s handwriting
or Percy Shelley’s annotations and editing. Until two months ago, consulting
these materials would have required extensive travel in England and the United
States and very privileged access to scattered institutions. Now, these
original documents are accessible for study on your personal computer or
tablet.
This remarkable initiative required generous funding — in
large part by America’s National Endowment for the Humanities — and the
concerted efforts of several institutions, notably Oxford’s Bodleian Library
and the New York Public Library. The project’s impressive Advisory Board and
tech experts include the contribution of the ever-eminent Charles E. Robinson,
author of The Frankenstein Notebooks,
who provides an invaluable introduction and a Frankenstein chronology.
Frankenstein is only
the first offering in a proposed web-based archive of the entire works of
“England’s First Family of Writers”, namely Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, her
husband Percy Bysshe Shelley and Mary’s parents, Mary Wollstonecraft and John
Goodwin.
It speaks to the enduring importance of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
that it should be the first work of the
Shelley-Godwin Archives to be published online. The study of Frankenstein has taken an astonishing leap forward.
Labels: Mary Shelley
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)