And so we come to Day Seven. I’ll be posting new links today
and the Peter Cushing Centennial Blogathon will wrap up around midnight.
To start off, if I may — my turn! — let me tell you about Peter
Cushing…
I was introduced to Peter Cushing as a pre-teen one fabulous
summer day in 1961, at a neighborhood second-run theatre. They were running a
triple-bill. Curse of Frankenstein, Horror
of Dracula and The Mummy. Can you imagine? A crash course in Terence Fisher,
Jimmy Sangster, Cushing, Lee and the supremely talented crew at Hammer Films,
all in one afternoon. It remains one of the most vivid, magical days of my
life.
In my first exposure to Cushing, I saw him as the valorous
Van Helsing, the intrepid John Banning wrestling Chris Lee’s relentless Mummy,
and the driven, cold-hearted Baron Frankenstein. A few weeks later, they ran The
Revenge of Frankenstein, and I was all
caught up with Hammer. Soon after, I saw The Curse of the Werewolf, first run, and I would go on to see all the Hammer
films, usually on the very day they came out, over the next two decades.
I loved Hammer Films. I loved the busy, wallpapered
Victorian sets, stuffed with props and drenched in dark colors. I loved the
percussive score that punctuated the inevitable carriage escape by The Baron,
or Van Helsing’s race to reach Dracula’s coffin before the sun went down. I
loved Frankenstein’s steampunk labs, the whirling Wimshurst generator. I loved
how there was always a wheel stuck, a sticky lever or some piece of unreliable
equipment bursting into flames. I loved Frankenstein’s dysfunctional creations,
the spastic Chris Lee, the big blue Kiwi Kinston, the gorilla-like Dave Prowse
and all the others. I loved the Hammer heroines, cleavage and all. I loved
Christopher Lee, his magnificent presence as Dracula, as tall and still as the
2001 Monolith, turning animalistic after feeding, face smeared with gore, tears
of blood. Most of all, I loved Peter Cushing. That gaunt skull face, those
killer cheekbones. Those blue eyes.
As Van Helsing, dressed in baggy tweeds, carrying a doctor’s
kit stuffed with holy water, a bible, a mallet and a supply of wooden stakes,
Cushing’s blue eyes were soulful. As Baron Frankenstein, trust up in a tight
waistcoat, narrow suit, turned up collar, seemingly starched head to foot,
Cushing’s blue eyes were as cold as death itself.
Late in his career, Cushing played Grand Moff Tarkin in the
first Star Wars film, introducing him to
a whole new generation of fans. Perhaps more people have seen him in Star
Wars than all his other films combined. I
remember watching him up on the big screen. Hammer Films had disintegrated, but
I was happy that he was still active, older, yes, but in full control,
perfectly cast, a formidable villain with a bird of prey profile.
I often wondered what Cushing’s appeal was, what made him so
compelling to watch, what made him so damn cool. I wondered what drove him to
be so rigorous, so meticulous in his work.
In real life, by all accounts, Peter Cushing was a gentle
soul, a generous sort, perfectly unassuming, and one who very much liked to
laugh. When you read up on Peter Cushing, you like him even more. What made him
so compassionate, so genuine?
I think I found the answer. Peter Cushing himself told us.
When Cushing wrote letters, when he signed an autograph, he
always used the same formula. He would write, “May God’s blessings be with
you always…” and then three word, followed
by his signature.
Those three important words described his approach to
acting, his dedication. Three words that oriented his private life and revealed
his true heart. Three words…
“
In all sincerity”.
At
The Cameraman’s Revenge, James Russell offers smart appraisals of Cushing’s two mid-Sixties
sorties as Dr. Who.
Our last Blogathon contribution deals, appropriately, with
Peter Cushing’s last film.
Biggles, from
1986, was an attempt at revitalizing the classic British pilot hero, with time
travel thrown in.
Peter Cushing’s Last Bow,
posted on The Secret Sanctum of Captain Video, features links to a trailer and the whole film, available on YouTube.
Over the last seven days, I have posted some 80 links from
over 30 sources, all discussing and celebrating the exceptional work and the
remarkable life of Peter Cushing on this, his 100th Anniversary.
I am amazed by the variety, the originality and the quality
of research and writing that I have been privileged to share here. Thank you so
much to all the contributors, and thank you to all our visitors — I hope you
have all enjoyed the Blogathon as much as I did.
Peter Cushing has been gone now for almost 20 years, but his
films are being preserved, his work is widely available and he may very well be
as popular today as he ever was. To us, his fans, he remains a vibrant presence
in our lives.
6 comments:
Thank you so much for organizing this blogathon. It was wonderful to read so many heartfelt tributes every day. I can't quite put into words why I love Peter Cushing so much (I didn't even try to blog; I just promoted everyone on Twitter as much as I could!). Reading wonderful, articulate posts like yours has been such a pleasure and a privilege. My only complaint is that the blogathon wasn't longer. :)
I keep repeating myself, but thank you, Pierre for organizing this blogathon. I have learned a lot from the many and varied postings. I think you made a very good point today about Peter Cushing's appeal: "In all sincerity." Some actors don't seem to believe what they are doing. He was sincere.
This blogfest has been incredible. So much talent, so much affection. However, your piece today - really crystalized my deep and abiding affection for Peter Cushing and his work - thank you for pinpointing it - it's his sincerity. Thank you for setting this up - we've marked this milestone well, I think.
Thank you so much for an elucidating and fun time.
Thanks for hosting the Blogathon and bringing together such diverse and remarkable work. I was truly honored to be able to participate.
A wonderfully sincere tribute to that sincere man, Pierre.
I would just add that I think that the first seven words of his sign-off mean as much as the final three that you cite...
Their was a spark of The Divine within the man that he shared with us.
-Craig
Post a Comment