February 27, 2009

The Covers of Frankenstein : Weird, Dec. 1971
The Myron Fass Story



Struck by lightning, carrying off a swooned damsel, the Frankenstein Monster is pursued by torch-bearing villagers on a December ’71 Weird cover illustration cobbled together from two other Eerie Publications titles.

The main Frankenstein image was first used less than a year earlier on Horror Tales, December 1970, and the reclining red dress victim in the foreground is a screeching vampire lady lifted from an April 1970 issue of Tales from the Tomb.


Eerie Publications and its collection of schlocky horror titles are indelibly associated with publisher Myron Fass, but the line actually began in 1966 with Robert Farrell, a one-time comic book writer turned publisher. Farrell specialized in cheap magazines, notably a Mad knockoff called Panic produced in collaboration with Fass and Carl Burgos, the man who created The Human Torch character. Myron Fass also came from the comics, first as an artist, then publisher of his own early Mad copy called Lunatickle. The details of the relationship are sketchy, Farrell and Fass operated a bewildering labyrinth of criss-crossing imprints, often keeping their names off mastheads, but Fass was apparently partnered with Farrell through part of the Eerie Pubs adventure, eventually to buy him out and continue alone.

Myron Fass was the ultimate exploitation publisher, literally flooding the newsstands with countless magazine titles. There were skin mags like Jaguar, Poorboy and FLICK (its title in caps reading like certain four-letter word), true crime, hot rod and gun magazines, Famous Monsters knockoffs like Thriller and 3-D Monsters, pop music and gossip titles, TV Photo Story, and a slew of wild paranormal offerings like ESP and Official UFO. Writers were hired out of college and encouraged to make everything up. Al Goldstein, who would go on to publish Screw, learned the ropes as one of Fass’ writers. Contents were slapped together, printed on the cheapest newsprint available and rushed out to the stands. A title’s survival was predicated on a single, simple rule: It had to sell at least 20,000 copies.

A Fass specialty was the instant magazine, a one-shot deal capitalizing on a news event or a suddenly hot subject, literally written and assembled overnight, hand-delivered to the printing plant and on the street within days. Fass claimed he made millions off an instant title exploiting the Kennedy Assassination. Other subjects included The Beatles invasion, the Son of Sam murders, the death of Elvis Presley and the shooting of Hustler publisher Larry Flynt.

In 1966, Weird was Eerie Publications’ downmarket entry into the black and white horror comic magazine field pioneered by James Warren’s Eerie and Creepy. It was soon joined by Terror Tales, Horror Tales, Witches’ Tales, Tales of Voodoo, Terrors of Dracula and Tales from the Tomb, all basically the same magazine with different titles and interchangeable covers and contents. Early issues carried reprints of lowbrow horror comics from the Fifties, spruced up with ink washes or upgraded with extra grue.

As new material was phased in, the sleaze and gore scores were jacked up, making the Eerie titles synonymous with bad taste and stomach-churning violence. Black ink blood spurted across the pages and severed heads, for some reason, became a signature image, nearly ubiquitous on the covers, either hanging by their hair, strewn about the dungeon, lined up on laboratory tables or kept in bell jars. Unsurprisingly, the most notorious story published in the Eerie tiles was Dick Ayers’ 1972 ‘I Chopped Her Head Off!’.

Covers were unsigned and though names have been suggested, nobody agrees on who might have painted the lurid, disturbing images of gleeful torture, bloody impalement, cannibalism and other indignities visited equally on semi-clad, bound females (often fanged vampiresses) and various drooling monsters.

The classic flat-headed, bolt-neck Frankenstein Monster appeared on several Eerie Publications covers through the years, though he was just another creature in the company’s mix and match gallery of bloodthirsty ghouls, mummies and axe murderers.

By the late Seventies, the horror comic market was played out, with the Eerie Pubs titles among the last to let go. Fass would keep going a while with UFO titles, the often hilarious Ancient Astronauts, and a number of poorly done scifi movie magazines that cashed in on Star Wars mania. After quitting the business, Fass moved to Florida where he changed his name and ran a gun shop. He passed away in 2006.

As pop culture historians try to piece together the Myron Fass story, amusing and sometimes hair-raising tales emerge. Follow the links below to read more about one of the most colorful and controversial figures in magazine publishing.


‘Myron Fass, Demon God of Pulp’, with a cover gallery, on Bad Mags.

‘Myron Fass, Man of Mystery’ on The Empire of the Claw, and another Eerie Publications cover gallery.

Various Myron Fass titles can be sampled in the Datajunkie archives.


With thanks to Karswell of The Horrors of It All and Keith Smith for providing information. Additional material gleaned from an article by David A. Roach in The Warren Companion (Twomorrows Publishing, 2001).


February 24, 2009

The Covers of Frankenstein : Terror Tales, September 1970


A Frankenstein Monster gets its flat head chopped off — springs and screws flying — on this bracing cover for Terror Tales, one of publisher Myron Fass’ low-rent comics magazines from the early Seventies.

The typically slap-dash, lurid and overloaded composition features a fanged, mechanical Frankenstein Monster in bondage, an axe-wielding, web-footed werewolf, a ripped-dress victim, a skull-headed ghoul of some sort, tombstones, and two severed heads. Curiously enough, this one’s rather tame by Eerie Publications standards!

This illustration could have been used on any of Eerie Publications’ titles, like Tales from the Tomb and Weird. Covers and content were freely interchangeable, the only constant being a commitment to deliver bloody, gross-out horror.

Long regarded as the dregs of the black and white comics magazines, Myron Fass’ horror titles have since acquired their share of admirers and are celebrated as schlock masterpieces.

Stand by for more about Eerie Publications and the inimitable Myron Fass, coming up this week.


February 21, 2009

Dean Koontz's Frankenstein Franchise

Author Dean Koontz’s distinctive take on Frankenstein has spawned two novels (Prodigal Son and City of Night),
a comic book series, a graphic novel and a television film.

Now there’s a dedicated, one-stop website for Koontz’s Frankenstein titles featuring character bios, a book trailer, audiobook excerpts and comic page samples. There’s even an animated banner where The Monster — Deucalion — introduces himself.

Well done and spiffy.


Dean Koontz Frankenstein website


Related
Dean Koontz’s Frankenstein: The Comic Book

February 19, 2009

Awards Season


RONDO AWARDS
The Seventh Annual Rondo Hatton Classic Horror Award nominations were announced this week, “recognizing the best in monster research, creativity and genre appreciation”. I am truly honored to have Frankensteinia nominated as Best Horror Blog.
The Rondos are an online, fan-based award. Anyone can vote, and that means you! Click the link to see the large and very inclusive ballot. You can vote in as many or as few categories as you wish. You could even vote just for — ahem — Best Horror Blog! Voting closes on March 21st, but don’t wait… Vote Now!
Hats off to David Colton for undertaking the immense job of running the Rondos, and sincere congratulations to the nominees and my fellow horror bloggers, deserving all.

PREMIO DARDOS

I’ve been triple-Dardozed, even quadrupled if you count my companion blog, Monster Crazy!
In January, I was tagged with a Premio Dardos by Ray Young of Flickhead. The Dardos is a virtual prize where bloggers name five blogs they enjoy and each of those bloggers must then pass the award to five others. Turns out the Dardos — the dart — is more like a boomerang and, over the last few weeks, I’ve been re-Dardozed, so to speak.
I already posted my 5 picks first time around, so I’ll keep it at that, but I do want to thank writers John Morehead of Theofantastique and Ryan Harvey of The Realm of Ryan for honoring Frankensteinia as one of their Dardos picks.
Thanks also to Shahn of the magnificient Six Martinis and the Seventh Art who has bestowed a Dardos on my other blog, Monster Crazy. In keeping with the picture blog philosophy there, I’ve passed that one on to 5 other tumblelogs. The post is here.

HORRORBLIPS
Not an award, but recognition of sorts. A new aggregator site, HorrorBlips, has listed Frankensteinia, based on linkage, as high as #3 on their Horror Blog Rankings. I’m surprised to be fighting for the top ranks with sites like Dread Central who score 80+ posts per week, compared to my measly average of 4.

Again, do vote for the Rondo Awards, and thank you for considering Frankensteinia!

February 16, 2009

Mary Shelley and Her Frankenstein: The Actors Speak
by Max Cheney



I am delighted to have my friend Max Cheney, aka The Drunken Severed Head, as a guest blogger. In November of 2008, Max attended a world premiere performance of Mary Shelley and Her Frankenstein at the New Hazlett Theater in Pittsburgh and subsequently interviewed three of the principals. Here is Max’s review and a condensed version — my editing — of his Q&A sessions.

Written by Shirley R. Barasch, Mary Shelley and Her Frankenstein is a new dramatic work intertwining the real lives of Mary and Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and the rest of the party that gathered at Villa Diodati in 1816 (Where Mary began Frankenstein) with the characters of Mary Shelley’s book. As a first-time novelist, Mary wove many autobiographical details and personal concerns into her enduring story, and Barasch’s musical explores these parallels. The new play imaginatively fuses together the loneliness, personal tragedies and genius of the real people in Mary Shelley's circle with the characters she created.

The musical drama, produced by The Tuesday Musical Club, was thrilling and satisfying. The energetic young actors were well suited to their roles, and all displayed good-to-excellent singing voices. The set designs were first rate and impressive, creatively arranged and lighting large sections to make interiors from exteriors (such as a mansion from a ship) and suggesting settings as diverse as mountains, a court, and the workshop where Victor Frankenstein toils in secret to create life. The costumes were generally outstanding (so many were required that a few pieces were, unsurprisingly, only adequate), and the makeups were impressive (especially the Creature's.)

I was fortunate enough to meet some of the actors and interview them by e-mail. A planned interview with author and composer Shirley Barasch never came to be, due to illness striking Ms. Barasch; at the time of this writing she is still recuperating. She has my best wishes.

Playing Mary Shelley was the actress and soprano Brittany Graham; Justin Zeno played both Percy Shelley and Victor Frankenstein, and the Creature was played by actor J.D. Tully, in makeup by Chris Patrick of The Savini School.

What surprises came to you in playing your characters, or in learning about Mary and Percy Shelley?

Brittany Graham: I was surprised to learn how young Mary was when she began writing Frankenstein. I knew that she was a young women but I had no idea that she was barely 20 years old.

J.D. Tully: I think the biggest surprise came at how inhuman everyone was. Percy was never there for Mary, Claire leached off her, her father chastised her. Byron and the men just used her husband, and all the while she feels like she is so strange for being moral. It was that fact that really helped me see that the creature is not a monster, but a creature in a world where everyone around him had a darkened skewed perception at what people should be.

Justin Zeno: Upon reading the biographical information I was struck by quite a few items. The "free love" of the time which seems to be rampant throughout both the Shelley's lives and their peers. I'm also struck with how supportive Mary was of Percy's "sexual escapades." I recall reading a section that discussed Percy's "pimping" of Mary out to one of his friends. She seems to have loved him so much, she literally did whatever it took to keep his love. Discovering that Mary's half sister Fanny had written a suicide note stating that she was in love with Percy. And Harriet's suicide over Percy. What did this guy have? He reportedly had a high-pitched shrill voice and if you look at pictures he could easily be mistaken for a woman. Growing up with 5 sisters, I think he must have understood women on a greater level. I think they were drawn to his sense of romanticism.

I feel like the Percy portrayed in the show was definitely one that was romanticized by both Mary Shelley and Dr. B (author Shirley Barasch). I don't think I'd particularly like the actual Percy Shelley, however, Mary definitely provided this "angelic" version of Percy we have today when his father died and she was allowed to re-publish his poetry with her forwards about each piece. Obviously, an actual depiction of Percy wouldn't be very romantic or empathetic for an audience, so in this vein, I fell that Dr. B also had to romanticize our beloved poet.

Were there any funny or unusual moments during rehearsals?

Brittany Graham: The funniest moment was when Shirley realized why everyone was chuckling when I would say the line "Ecstasy, where is the ecstasy?" or when Justin would say, "I've tasted ecstasy!" It never occurred to Shirley that ecstasy is the name of a drug. It wasn't until Shirley asked why every one was laughing at that word then some one explained to her why that she realized. She laughed and laughed! We all got such a kick out of that.

J.D. Tully: Every mistake we made or crazy moment, we would blame on too much ecstasy.

Justin Zeno: The ecstasy thing was by far the funniest.

What was it that you most wanted to bring out in the characters that you played? Any emotions or experiences of your character that particularly "clicked" for you?

Brittany Graham: I wanted to bring out Mary's insecurities, not just in herself as a woman during this time period but also in her relationships with Percy, Claire, and her father. Shirley wrote these wonderful lines that would jab at certain characters who had a rocky relationship with Mary. It made it easy for me to create an almost schizophrenic attitude towards the people close to Mary. One minute the show would be so joyous and confident, the next she would be accusative and bitter.

Fortunately, I have a very strong support system with my family and friends so I could not relate to Mary's relational insecurities; however, seeing as we are about the same age, I was able to be myself amidst all of her unfortunate circumstances. I could relate to her occasional "feistiness" as I, myself, can occasionally be a "feisty" one.

J.D. Tully: I really wanted to bring out the compassion and loving nature of the creature, and also the loneliness. What people forget is that the creature has a human brain, and can feel and express human emotions, so I tried to show that he is very much human and longs for the same relationships that other humans have. Having these emotions in the show was not so much a matter of creating them, but rather taking the monster side of the creature really far and then putting him through situations to find the vulnerable human side. I think the one that really clicked the most is that misunderstood loneliness. So many times we just jump to conclusions about other people and forget that they are a person too.

Justin Zeno: In my research, I noted that Percy's obsession with the macabre was extremely strong, and so I really wanted to build on this idea from the first telling of the ghost stories to the point where he starts to see his doppelganger. On that note, Jane Williams (Percy's one-time lover) reportedly also saw Percy's double on the terrace and Percy himself at the same time. Years later, it was discovered that he indeed had a look alike. So who knows...

The sense of romanticism and impetuous love was so great with Percy. He fell in love with people at the drop of the hat. Something I've probably done myself way too many times. I really feel like he was sincere in the moment with people, but he did Mary in particular a great disservice because of it.

What clicked for me? Something that happened very late in the rehearsal process for me, and I give total credit to our choreographer Kiesha Lalama-White for this. The last scene between Percy and Mary… That feeling when someone you love is really angry at you - and all you want is for them to call you back and say it's ok before you say goodbye. That pull. It was an incredibly strong feeling to tap into once Kiesha suggested it. Also, the empathy and pain for Mary with her multiple miscarriages. The great emotional pain it caused for her. Victor to me is MUCH less empathetic — he is proud and wants to know what it feels like to become a "creator." It's the whole Garden of Eden all over again. I'd like to meet Adam so I could punch him in the face - so therefore, I have little empathy for Victor. Although, the moment of realization of what he had done was a great one to play on stage.

J. D., did the costume and makeup affect your acting choices, and if so, how? Did you enjoy the playing the part?

J. D. Tully: OOOOO YEAH!!! The rehearsal practice was spent in bare feet (originally we had the Creature in no shoes since he would have been too big for any pair back then), jeans, and t-shirts. The thing was that we weren't really sure of the dimensions and look of the mask so we had no idea what to rehearse in. It was difficult to work with originally, but then we just took the original blocking and motions and enlarged them to creature size. It was all very difficult, and EXTREMELY draining, but such a joy and enriching experience. If I could do it all again I would in a bolt of lightning.

What was your earliest exposure to the characters of Frankenstein and what was your impressions or reactions?

Brittany Graham: My earliest exposure to the characters in "Frankenstein" was when I saw the 1931 movie version, directed by James Whale. I was very young and easily frightened, so this movie served it's purpose as a horror film. I was indeed very frightened of the creature, who I continued to think was named Frankenstein.

Being so young, I did not understand what Victor Frankenstein had done. I couldn't comprehend the ramifications of taking the ability to create life into your own hands. At the age of 10, I'm sure I didn't give it much thought, but I can imagine I was very confused by the movie.

J.D. Tully: I was first introduced to the characters of Frankenstein through popular culture and then I read the novel in my freshman year of high school. I remember that I liked it a lot, but my chief reaction, being a vampire fanatic, was that it was not Dracula!

Justin Zeno: Well, I always loved Frankenberry cereal! That was probably my earliest exposure. As far as Mary Shelley's Frank, I read it for the first time for this production and adored it. I couldn't put it down really. Amazing how accessible her writing is, especially when you try to read Percy or Byron's writing. She was ahead of her time in so many ways.

Who is the more "sinned against," Victor or the Monster-- and why you feel that way?

Brittany Graham: The Monster. He was done a disservice being created by a man who was unable to provide him with the very things a human needs to survive: food, shelter, and companionship. Victor was able to relish in his accomplishments without thought towards what to do next. The Monster was doomed to walk the Earth without an understanding of who he is and what his purpose is.

J. D. Tully: Creature, hands down, not a question. Victor decides he wants to try and create life, and when he succeeds he realizes it is in appropriate. However, rather than dealing with his problem, he runs away, leaving the new "born" creature to learn the world for himself. Then when the Creature finally finds his father, he is rejected. All the Creature wants is to live, love, and be loved. So when his dream is shattered by his father, I find it understandable that he gets angry and goes a little nuts. Even so, the creature repents in the end and begs for forgiveness from his father, god, and the world. All Victor did was grieve for his own losses. Creature totally wins that one... score for the creature!

Justin Zeno: The monster, of course. Anyone with low self-esteem will tell you. He "didn't ask to be born." And society has always been partial to beauty. Granted, our perception of beauty changes with time - but deformity has never been a crowd pleaser. It's the old brains versus beauty controversy. Obviously beauty wins.

Why do you think Mary Shelly's story and characters have lasted so long?

Brittany Graham: It's a classic! As long as the movie is made available and the novel remains on the eight-grade reading list, the story will last forever. People will always be interested in the things that have yet to be. Perhaps if we do start creating people from the "bare bones and rotting flesh of others", people will lose interest in the Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein".

J. D. Tully: Well they're just so intricate. An upstanding doctor who brings flesh back to life, though completely unthinkable, allows the imagination to wonder what else can happen in the sciences of life. A creature who looks like a monster but is more human than anyone on this earth. You love and hate them all which is always a fun dichotomy.

Some would say that Frankenstein is about the harm science might create blindly, and some that it is humankind's inability to be fully human until it is fully humane. What do you think Shelley's primary theme is? What is she warning us of?

Brittany Graham: Shirley writes it in her script. Mary says, "I want others to know the horrors of science without feeling. The very inhumanity of such doings." Mary is warning us of the consequences of creating "life" without thought towards what is required to sustain that "life". You wouldn't create a plant without supplying water. You wouldn't create an animal without supplying food. Just as you cannot create a healthy, functional human being without supplying companionship, something Victor was unwilling to provide for the Creature; thus, we see the results clearly in Mary's novel.

J.D. Tully: I think it is a combination of both. Shelley is warning us of what happens when we lose our humanity. We become cold and hollow, which allows for all manner of poor choices to be made. Humans must remember that we are humane, or else we are nothing more than monsters.

Justin Zeno: I think she's warning us about ourselves. The potential we EACH have inside to "create" a monster that is greater than ourselves which has the potential to destroy everything we love. I think she's warning us to be satisfied when we find happiness, instead of always wanting more. And of course, she's warning against "playing god," but as I said before - that archetype goes back to Lucifer and Adam and Eve.

Thank you for your interesting answers, Brittany, J.D., and Justin!


And thank you, Max!


Update: Max has posted the complete, unabridged interviews, with additional photos, on his blog, The Drunken Severed Head.


Mary Shelley and Her Frankenstein website.

Reviews in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and Pop City Media.


February 14, 2009

The Covers of Frankenstein : The New Yorker by Edward Sorel

An optimistic Monster waits for his date to be blasted to life in Edward Sorel’s superb St-Valentine’s cover for The New Yorker, February 1997.

Doing a cover for The New Yorker is a point of pride and prestige for artists. Edward Sorel has over 40 to his credit. His distinctive, loose line drawings are conceived and explored through several roughs, with the final piece inked directly onto the paper, without benefit of an underlying pencil sketch, a trick akin to a trapeze artist working without a safety net. When satisfied with the line work, Sorel finishes it in watercolors or wash. The result is a polished work of art that still retains the intuitive, nervous energy of a first draft.

Sorel is a multiple award-winning artist, elected to the Art Directors Club of New York Hall of Fame in 2002. He was a founding member, with Milton Glaser and Seymour Chwast, of the legendary Push Pin Studio. His works have graced all the major American magazines, and have been exhibited the world over.


Edward Sorel’s website.

The Art Directors Club of New York Sorel page, with a fine biography of Sorel written by R.O.Blechman.

The New Yorker website.


February 13, 2009

Hammer Horrors Playing Cards


Found on the delightful and deliciously deranged (and sometimes nsfw) Deadlicious blog, these Hammer Films playing cards were produced by the Heritage Toy and Game Company in the early 90’s.

Nothing fancy here, just card faces decorated with stills, most of them in black and white, from classic Hammer Horrors, including a handful of Frankensteins.

The Deadlicious blog, by its own definition, celebrates “lowbrow art to hardcore bikes, trash literature, tattoos, weird things of all kinds”. Our hosts, if you can get your brains around this, are Frenchmen who wear luchadores masks and, among other things, create unique rock n’roll pastries and pies. No kidding. I, for one, know where I’m heading first next time I’m in Paris.

You can follow their gigs and gatherings on Deadlicious Nation, and be sure to visit the Deadlicious website to discover their amazing patisseries. Deadlicious also keeps a lively MySpace page.

Filo Loco of the Deadlicious crew, has invited Frankensteinia to join the Deadlicious Hot Blog Circle, an informal gathering of blogs that display “cool stuff, free spirit and attitude”. I'm game!

Merci, Filo!


More Hammer Cards on Deadlicious.


February 11, 2009

The Art of Frankenstein : Alex Kirwan


Alex Kirwan is an art director, storyboard artist and writer for animation. His work includes the character design for Nickelodeon’s My Life as Teenage Robot (2003-2005).

As a painter, his art often references horror and cult movies with stylized portraits of such characters as Barbarella, Gort and Robbie The Robot.

Kirwan’s eye-popping, funky and elegant takes on The Bride of Frankenstein and Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein were painted for the Burning Brush Show in 2000.


Alex Kirwan at Gallery Nucleus, and his IMDB page.


February 9, 2009

Stitched Together


Drs. Frankenstein and Pretorius dial up a storm and listen to its secrets.

Stitched Together is a perfect title for this short-short film, an experiment in “reverse soundtracking” created in 2006 by Nick Sherman of MassArt, the Massachusetts College of art and Design.

Quote Mr. Sherman, “First I recorded and mixed an abstract guitar composition on its own — not knowing what I was going to do with it — then I animated it, using chopped up video taken from the famous lab scene in Universal's 1935 The Bride of Frankenstein.”

The resulting 74 seconds of film is spellbinding. The jangling soundtrack hums and crackles with electricity and static as if powered by the machines in Frankenstein’s lab, bouncing off the stark images of The Bride’s creation, “creating new meaning through the juxtaposition of visuals and audio”.


Stitched Together by Nick Sherman.

Additional info found on Nick Sherman’s website news archives.

Nick Sherman’s MySpace page.


February 6, 2009

Third Dimensional Frankenstein


In a publicity photo, an unsuspecting Pete Smith is stalked by Ed Payson’s Frankenstein.

With a background as a Billboard reviewer and a studio publicist, Pete Smith was hired as Head of the Publicity Department at MGM in 1925. By 1930, he had drifted to the Production Department, moonlighting as writer and narrator of short subjects, where he found his true calling. Smith’s nose for novelty, his gently ironic humor and his folksy, mock-serious delivery clicked with audiences. By the mid-thirties, Smith was a full-time producer/narrator churning out the enormously popular one-reel comic documentaries that came to be known as Pete Smith Specialties. Sometimes billing himself as A Smith Named Pete, he would produce over 150 of his signature oddball one-reelers over a period of 25 years.

A favorite subject of Smith’s was sports, providing humorous looks at everything from tennis, ping pong and bowling to ice hockey, sail-, horse- and auto-racing, an annual look at football, and bizarre athletics like hurling, human surfboarding, and donkey baseball. With their emphasis on trick shots and spectacle, these shorts were the forerunners of the sports highlight reels on TV today.


Animals were always good as a ten-minute program filler, with Smith expounding on exotic birds, rare fish, rambunctious sea lions and, especially, dogs. A documentary on dogcatchers was done from the point of view of the catchee, and two shorts were devoted to Fala, President FDR’s famous First Pooch. Semi-serious subject matter, illuminated with wry commentary, included a history of anesthesia, the “romance” of radium, a look at chain-letter fraud, cooking lessons, dancing tips with Arthur Murray, a Depression-era feature on inflation, and, as the war years unfolded, patriotic episodes dealing with marines in training, scrap metal drives and hiring people with disabilities.

Some of Smith’s output was outright comedy, notably a series of fake newsreels repurposing old silents with new narration, presented as Metrophony and Whataphony Newsreels, or Super Stupid Pictures.

Smith’s writers included Thorne Smith, creator of Topper, and the team of Robert Lees and Fred Rinaldo, who would go on to script the classic Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. Directors were a who’s who of B-Movie journeymen like Felix Feist, Nick Grinde (director of Boris Karloff vehicles at Columbia), Edward L. Cahn, Joseph M. Newman, and short subject specialists like Ray McCarey and the formidable Jules White who would oversee the screen career of The Three Stooges. Jacques Tourneur, who would go on to direct Cat People, I Walked With A Zombie and Out of the Past made his first American films for Pete Smith, notably Killer Dog, a short about a dog on trial for murder. A few of Smith’s directors would graduate to ‘A’ pictures. Fred Zinneman went on to make High Noon and George Sidney would direct splashy, big budget musicals the likes of Pal Joey with Frank Sinatra and Viva Las Vegas with Elvis Presley.

In the Forties, Smith found a kindred soul in Dave O’Brien, a character actor with a flair for the absurd and a talent for pratfalls. O’Brien is best remembered today as the panicky pothead — “Faster! Play it faster!” — in the cult classic Reefer Madness (1936). O’Brien also played opposite Bela Lugosi in The Devil Bat (1940), and he was Republic’s Captain Midnight.

Under Smith’s supervision, O’Brien wrote and, as “David Barclay”, directed numerous Specialties in which he grappled with household appliances, lawnmowers, breakaway furniture, goofy inventions, mothers-in-law, hiccups and hair loss. Introduced as Silas Q. Softheart, Chris Crusty, Joe Thunderstruck, Thadeus E. Thud the Third, Wrong Way Butch, or The Indestructible Falstaff Pratt, O’Brien was Smith’s onscreen alter ego, stepping and stumbling his way into domestic chaos, do-it-yourself mishaps and assorted minor catastrophes. When the Pete Smith Specialties wrapped in 1955, the last episode, The Fall Guy, was a tribute to O’Brien, compiling his most spectacular misadventures.

On several occasions through the years, Smith explored visual effects with episodes devoted to microscopic lenses, the history of photography, and a 1940 Oscar-winning entry, Quicker’n a Wink, featuring the stroboscopic cinematography of Harold Edgerton that first introduced a wide audience to super slow-motion films such as a bullet hitting a light bulb and a hummingbird in flight. Scenes from the film would be reused in documentaries and television programs for years to come.

Pete Smith’s eventual encounter with The Frankenstein Monster was seeded in 1935 with Audioscopics, an experiment in two-color 3-D using the Leventhal and Nordling anaglyph system. The short was so popular it spawned a second entry, The New Audioscopics, in 1938. The films explained the 3-D process and then proceeded to assail the viewers with sundry objects — ladders, slide trombones and so on — poking off the screen. Posters for the 3-D shorts show a movie audience looking up at a gigantic screen as a pitcher throws an enormous baseball over their heads. Another poster featured a rampaging elephant leaping into the audience. The same type of poster would be commonly used by exhibitors in the 3-D craze of the early Fifties, with lions, projectiles, or the Creature from the Black Lagoon bursting off the screen. In fact, the effect is still used today. A poster for the recent My Bloody Valentine 3D shows an audience recoiling from a looming pickaxe.

In 1941, a third 3-D film was made, this time with a simple storyline. Written by Jerry Hoffman and directed by George Sidney, Third Dimensional Murder (also known as Murder in 3-D) presented its 3-D tricks in a haunted house framework. The scary cast of this trapdoor and cobweb infested mansion included a cackling witch, a wooden Indian, a chattering skeleton and one character with a bone through his nose (referred to as a zombie) shoving tarantulas, spearheads, clubs and claws at the viewer. The recurring menace here is “Frankenstein” who first appears on a landing brandishing a lantern.

King-sized character actor Ed Payson wore a pasty-faced buckethead makeup by Jack Kevan, and the bulky sheepskin vest seen in Universal’s Son of Frankenstein in 1939. The climax has Frankenstein hurling masonry and a burning log off the roof, ultimately pulling a Quasimodo and pouring “hot sizzling molten lead” onto our heads, and even throwing the cauldron after it.

MGM’s 3-D shorts proved immensely popular and tens of thousands of cardboard glasses were handed out to patrons as the films were booked over and over again through the years. During the 3-D craze of the Fifties, the three shorts were cut together and released as Metroscopics for a last lap around the track. In the years since, as Pete Smith once ubiquitous films lapsed from popular memory, Third Dimensional Murder was rarely shown again, acquiring something of a cult reputation. Now, in the age of YouTube, the film is freely available on the net.

You need 3-D glasses to watch it, but even then, the two-color separation seems to be a bit too wide and it’ll look fuzzy even with the special eyewear. Nevertheless, Frankenstein’s first 3D adventure is fun, if corny, and it’s a fascinating curio.

Here's a typical “Pete Smith Specialty”, Things We Can Do Without, written by and starring Dave O’Brien, from 1953. On Hit City Video.
Pete’s Scopics, an article on Pete Smith’s 3-D films.

February 5, 2009

Updates

On occasion, I’ll update an old post if I come up with new and relevant information. Here are a couple of recent fixes…

• I found a wonderful snapshot of Famous Monsters editor Forry Ackerman and cover artist Basil Gogos posing with the original artwork for the Boris Karloff Tribute issue that I featured a couple of posts back, on February 2.

Go look!

Frankensteinia friend and guest blogger Marc Berezin — who wrote a fascinating review of the 1968 British ITV adaptation of Frankenstein with Ian Holm — reports that the episode, up ‘til now available only as a bootleg tape, is being officially released on DVD come March 23.

Here’s the Amazon UK link.


February 3, 2009

T.S.Kuebler's Frankenstein


An actor in makeup? No. Incredibly, it's a sculpture, by Thomas Scott Kuebler.

Schooled in prop making, toy design and animatronics, inspired by “monsters and bogeymen… scary movies, zoological science, anatomy (and) puppetry”, T.S.Kuebler combines unusual skills, extraordinary talent and a unique personal vision to create life-sized, three-dimensional figures fashioned in silicone and mixed media.

Kuebler sees his work as storytelling. “I wanted to bring to life the kind of lore that brought me so much joy as a child,” he writes, “each new sculpture a fascinating biography of the bizarre. A tangible tale told right in front of you.” At Kuebler’s call, monsters of myth and movies, freaks and sideshow curiosities spring to stunning life. His creations are freighted with meticulous details, vivid emotion and palpable character.

Kuebler’s obvious affection for Karloff’s Frankenstein Monster is manifest in the pieces shown here, capturing the Creature in poses recalling famous movie scenes. At top and left, The Monster holds a daisy, from the lake scene with the little girl, a brief, awkward moment of joy in The Monster’s tragic life. Below, The Monster enjoys a cigar — Smoke, Good! — when befriended by the blind hermit, another unguarded moment when The Monster finds a fleeting instance of peace in a brutal world.

Kuebler’s cutting edge waxworks are truly magnificent, heartfelt homages.

See many more fantastic creations on T.S.Kuebler’s website. The Frankenstein Monster appears in the Gallery, under Classics and Legends.

In a decidely Frankensteinian register, check out Myron Klinefelter’s Revenge featuring an animated, remote control cadaver, and Dr. Nighty-Night (who reminds me a bit of Ernest Thesiger) who relies on a galvanized headless corpse to propel his wheelchair.


Previously featured on this blog: T.S.Kuebler's magnificent Skull of Frankenstein


February 2, 2009

Unforgettable

I can’t believe it’s been forty years since Boris Karloff passed away, on February 2, in 1969. I was a teenager then and I remember hearing it on the news. I remember the newspaper obituaries, often illustrated with a picture of the Frankenstein Monster… as played by Glenn Strange. I’ve always felt privileged to have seen a few Boris Karloff movies in theaters when they came out, AIP films with Vincent Price and Peter Lorre like The Raven (1963) and The Comedy of Terrors (1964), and Peter Bogdanovich’s Targets (1968).

What strikes me — after all these years — is how brightly Boris Karloff’s star still shines. In his lifetime, Karloff was a popular character actor, a favorite movie villain, yet his work has endured and grown in stature. A handful of his best films are regarded now as genuine classics, and many of his lesser films enjoy cult status.

Few actors of his era are still celebrated, or even remembered anymore, yet Karloff’s name still resonates. It is still instantly recognizable and immediately associated with horror films. In the forty years that have gone by, Karloff’s films has been constantly available on video and DVD, his life and his work have been examined in books and documentaries and, of course, his association with the Frankenstein Monster is indelible, endlessly referenced, captured on stamps, sampled in advertising, accumulating into a genuine icon of the twentieth century.

In the summer of 1969, Famous Monsters of Filmland #56 was entirely devoted to Karloff. The tribute issue cover was painted by Basil Gogos.


A beautiful copy of the painting, sans overprinting, appears in the fabulous Famous Monsters Movie Art of Basil Gogos compiled by Kerry Gammill and J. David Spurlock.


Update!

Found in Famous Monsters No. 57, here’s a wonderful snapshot — taken in the New York offices of publisher James Warren — of editor Forry Ackerman and artist Basil Gogos back in 1969, posing with the original painting for the Karloff Tribute issue.


Boris Karloff’s IMDB page.